Raising real men. What is the point of serving in the army? Why does a state need an army story

Answer from Return of the Great Bunny [guru]
so that on the example of chess, the top feel their power, like chess, controlling them. I don't see any more goals, we need an army of the will of the people, and not one where children shoot their parents, who for money and who does not understand

Answer from Oksana Klimenko[newbie]
To make guys out of men

Answer from Vovka Sharapov[expert]
The Army makes Guys from Boys!

Answer from Yoerog ??? riv ?? ss[guru]
What if they attack us tomorrow, from where you can know ... And they serve so that, if a war starts, we would be ready for this and would know at least how to shoot a weapon

Answer from Alexander Tsar[expert]
will help a lot. makes homosexuals out of fagots

Answer from Denis Vasev[expert]
here, so that there was no green snot, but a courageous, strong man!

Answer from Oman Bogatov[guru]
you have seen many eyewitnesses))) and do you really think that if there is no war, then soldiers are not needed?)

Answer from Ѐomanov Alexander[guru]
For you "uncle" will defend the Motherland. Squishy you, my dear, not a man.

Answer from Loser[guru]
Army (from Latin armare - to arm) - part of the armed forces of the state; e.g. RKKA and RKKF, Soviet Army and Navy, invading army, active army, covering army, expeditionary army

Answer from Ѕottabych[guru]
so that the children of the poor can take up arms at the right time and defend the interests of the poor ...

Answer from MaKsOH[guru]
I think that before there was really an army ... But there was no hazing, no discipline, etc. One rubbish
And the army is only for the Tick of our Country, as if we are so strong, blah blah. Purely for the sake of sight

Answer from Dmitriy[guru]
So you pushes not dry, but in normal troops, the press will get up across the throat!

Answer from Seawolf[guru]
Russia only needs the Strategic Missile Forces with the calculations of officers, with the rank of colonel not lower ...))

Answer from Victor Santa[guru]
so that everyone who leaves there would receive a disability certificate

Answer from 8kostil8[guru]
Now it gives the ability to peel potatoes, and miss sex. It would have been done on a contract basis long ago. Pros should serve in the army, not green youths. In a year, what can you master there? ... It's just a waste of a year that could be used to make money or to study. Personally, my opinion. ...
Here they are still pushing about the courage of speech, you can buy it on the street. If you were a seal in life, then no army will fix you ..

Answer from Msu[guru]
We need OMON more.

Answer from Yergey Biryukov[guru]
If you want to live in peace, prepare for war.

Answer from i'm a cat[newbie]
Countries that invest a lot of money in the army are usually militaristic. Their constitution smacks of militarism

The concept of educational work in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation states that, despite the development of military equipment and weapons, the decisive role in a war still belongs to a person, his military spirit and ability to fight. Any brave man can get confused in the situation of a real battle, in the confusion, make a wrong move, and this mistake can turn into a disaster. To prevent this from happening, drill is required, which fosters the ability to quickly respond to orders and brings all actions of a fighter to automatism. As experienced fighters who have passed hot spots say, a good level of drill forms a set of signals that the soldier performs automatically and understands without explanation. “It is difficult to achieve precise actions of soldiers in modern combat without properly delivered drill training. Now, when subunits and units are saturated with sophisticated equipment, when the role of collective weapons in combat has significantly increased, the level of combat training should be especially high, "the Concept of educational work in the RF Armed Forces states.

What kids need to know about the army

Children often ask themselves the question: why serve in the armyand why the army do you even need? The answers are very simple.

Our country is considered independent, therefore, its task is to protect the rights and freedoms of those who live in it. To do this, Russia must have a strong army with which no one wants to get involved. Otherwise, other countries may conquer it. All healthy men should be ready to fight back the enemy at any time. But readiness alone is not enough, otherwise, why army spend so much effort and money on training soldiers?

The army is now using a lot of sophisticated equipment and weapons. Sailors need to know and be able to do one thing, pilots - another, tankmen - the third. And Russia also has a Space Military Force that needs very smart and educated people. So even the most courageous person will not be able to defeat the enemy if he does not undergo special training.

You need to learn to defend your homeland. This is exactly what they do during military service. Therefore, every young man, when he turns 18, or after he graduates from the institute, must serve 1 year. Previously, they went into the army for 2 years, but then the service life was reduced so that the soldiers did not miss home much. For a year, a young man will be taught everything that a real fighter needs to be able to, otherwise it is not clear why did he serve in the army.

In the rifle training class, servicemen are taught how to shoot various weapons and how to disassemble and clean them. In technique lessons, they explain how military vehicles work, what capabilities they have and what to do if something breaks down. And then there is tactical training. They show how best to place troops, how units should move when attacking, and how - when defending. This is something that not only commanders need to know, but ordinary soldiers as well. Indeed, in battle, if an officer dies, the command must be taken over by one of the privates.

Classes in the army are theoretical (the same as in school) and practical. They take place at shooting ranges and ranges. Trained soldiers participate in exercises to consolidate their knowledge and feel like real fighters. And of course, the soldiers go in for sports a lot and train to fight hand-to-hand, so they return home strong and strong. The way real men should be.

When the year of service ends, the soldier is retired. This means that he no longer needs to be in the army, but if a war suddenly starts, he will be ready to defend the country from enemies. And some of the soldiers who liked it here and who understood why do you need to serve in the army, remain - and over time may become officers. The state concludes a contract with them - and pays wages. The army for such people becomes a real job.

Army for children, of course, it does not threaten, but, nevertheless, it would be good to know in advance all the details about the future service.

There is no need to be afraid that you will be sent directly from the recruiting office to the other end of the country. Now almost all the soldiers are serving close to home. And the fighters also have two days off a week, so that you can spend them meeting with parents and friends. Of course, in our large country there are military units located in deep forests, endless steppes or beyond the Arctic Circle. There must also be someone to serve. But either contractors or volunteers are sent there.

What else you need to know children about military service? The soldiers' daily routine has changed. Now they get up not at 6 am, but at 7, and go to bed at 11 pm. And those who have to do a lot and train a lot are allowed to rest during the day, in a quiet hour. Surely many have heard about how soldiers walk in outfits in the kitchen, sweep the territory of the unit and wash the floors in the barracks. So, now all this is no longer in the army. To carry out household work, the army hires special workers who are paid for this. And the soldiers are just learning military affairs, training in shooting accuracy and playing sports.

Before military service for children it is worth knowing this - it dragged on for 2 years, so there was enough time to watch the kitchen and learn how to shoot. Now they serve only 1 year, so there is no time to be distracted, you need to learn to defend your homeland.

And the worst thing that was told children about soldiers, Is that the commanders in the army beat their subordinates. This did happen in the old army, but now all officers are obliged to act humanely towards their soldiers. Lawyers, special parental committees, and especially members of the military prosecutor's office are constantly monitoring how soldiers are treated. This is a serious state organization, which is responsible for ensuring that all laws are observed in military units and there is no hazing. And if the commander nevertheless decides to teach a lesson to his subordinate, he will be punished very severely for this, he may even be sent to prison.

At all children about the army you should also know that changes are constantly taking place in it. This is done so that the service is not a heavy duty and so that all conscripts can usefully spend a year in a military unit, fulfilling their duty. During this time, you can learn to defend your homeland and become a real man.

Russia has always been famous for its mighty warriors, heroes, who from time immemorial defended the borders of their state. At different times feat of a Russian soldier helped to defeat the Tatar-Mongol hordes, German and Swedish knights, in general, all those who wanted to conquer our country. Legendary generals, for example, Alexander Nevsky, under whose command a victory was won at Lake Peipsi, or Dmitry Donskoy, who won the famous battle at Kulikovo Field, led the battle of heroes.

Over time, the appearance of the Russian hero was transformed: weapons changed and uniform of the Russian army... Instead of spears and swords, the first guns and cannons appeared, and the warriors themselves ceased to cling to steel armor, which still could not protect them from a bullet, and began to dress in uniforms. But the fighting spirit and folk traditions were preserved. Courageous army soldiers Peter the Great defeated the Swedes in the battle of Poltava. The regiments of Count Suvorov after long and fierce battles won the Ismail fortress from the Turks.

Could not conquer Russia and the French army of Napoleon, which everyone considered invincible. It was very hard for the Russian soldiers under the command of Kutuzov, the French even managed to take Moscow, but then they were forced to retreat.

The Russian soldiers showed their real heroic character during the most terrible war, the Great Patriotic War. Young boys and gray-haired old men who voluntarily went to the front or to the partisans did not ask how to become a soldier, however, their bravery and strength, dedication and heroism helped to achieve a great victory.

At first, they did not allow the Nazis to approach Moscow, and then drove them out of the territory of their country. In 1945, our army triumphantly entered Berlin, ridding the whole world of the fascist threat.

Soldiers' uniforms change, but heroism remains

At the same time, both Russian heroes and modern soldiers never attacked first and never tried to conquer foreign territory. But if Russia was in danger, then the whole country rose to its defense, from teenagers to old people, who did not spare their lives in the name of the Motherland. This was the case in the seventeenth century, when the people's militia, gathered by Minin and Pozharsky, drove the Polish invaders out of Moscow. So it was in the twentieth century, when everyone who could hold a weapon was sent to the front to fight the fascists. The era, arsenal and uniform of Russian soldiers do not matter, what matters is their invariably fighting spirit. We can only guess what it would look like russian soldier in the photo, if in those ancient times there were the appropriate technology, but we are sure that in his eyes the same thirst for victory would shine, which the modern Russian soldier is famous for.

Russian army soldier not only strong and brave, he is also kind. At all times, our soldiers were famous for never leaving their comrades in trouble, always helping the weak and offended and fighting for justice. It is not for nothing that epics were composed about the heroes of antiquity, and many books and films were written about the heroic deeds of soldiers during the Great Patriotic War. Russian soldiers on video and in fiction they always appear as noble defenders of the humiliated and insulted.

And today every self-respecting young man should go to serve in the army for one year and become a real Russian hero who will never give offense to his homeland. Fortunately, the equipment of a modern soldier, training and combat weapons, as well as the training system - everything is designed for this.

War is the worst thing that can happen in the world

War is the worst thing that can happen in the world. And the more powerful the weapon, the more terrible the war. Tens of millions of people died during the Second World War. And now several countries have nuclear weapons at once. One single modern bomb is enough to destroy an entire city and all its inhabitants. Therefore, if a new world war begins, then, most likely, all people on earth will die.

The President of Russia and other leaders are constantly trying to make sure that there will never be a war again. Any problem can be solved peacefully. For this, there are diplomats who are negotiating with representatives of other countries. But we must remember that no diplomats will help if Russia becomes a weak country. Then, sooner or later, someone will certainly decide to conquer it. After all, our country is very rich. In Russia, you can extract gas, oil, coal, gold, and even diamonds in Yakutia. Therefore, the country needs a strong army that can repel any, even the most sudden attack.

The President of Russia, who is also the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, speaks about this a lot. Recently, he ordered to strengthen the army and make sure that all troops are always on alert. This does not mean at all that our country is preparing for war. It's just that if the whole world knows that it is impossible to defeat the Russian army, then no one will dare to attack us.

Russia's defense capability is increasing all the time. Constructors create new aircraft, tanks, ships and missiles. Even space satellites are involved in the defense of the country, which, if someone attacks Russia, they will immediately detect it and warn the country's leadership about the danger. The government spends a lot of money to ensure that the army has everything that is new, modern and reliable.

But no weapon can fight by itself, without the participation of soldiers. The main defenders of the country are its inhabitants. And if a war, God forbid, of course, does begin, then every Russian should be ready to fight for his country and protect his family.

Unfortunately, many modern young people do not always consider it their duty to learn how to defend their country. They think that the army can do without them, and anyone should serve, but not they. Such people do not understand that only in the army does a young man become a real man who can stand up for himself, for his loved ones and for his homeland. Moreover, now you need to serve not two years, as before, but only one. Moreover, they try not to send soldiers very far from home so that they can communicate with relatives. But those who did not serve in the army will not be able to help Russia in the event of an attack.

And an attack can happen if everyone begins to evade service and the army becomes weaker. In addition, without an army, it is impossible to fight terrorists who blow up the houses of civilians, hijack airplanes and take hostages. The rulers of ancient Rome knew that any state needed strong warriors. They tried to follow the simple rule "if you want peace, prepare for war." This means that if a country has a strong army and its soldiers are ready to resist any enemy, then the sky over this country will always remain peaceful.

Information is presented from the site "All about the Army for Children"

It seems to me that it is worth starting here with the question: "What is war and what are its goals?"

There are many encyclopedic definitions of this term, but one thing unites them - war acts as a means of imposing his will on the opponent by force, as a result of which it forces him to give up freedom, from the rights to any property, from his ideology, etc.

It turns out that the war must inevitably be viewed from both economic and political points of view. After all, the world economy presupposes an inevitable increase in competition between countries, which means that in the end, the one who has large natural resources and sales markets remains on top.

If we project the aforesaid onto Russia, it turns out that today our country is extremely inconvenient for the entire West. Why?

The government is not at all going to transfer natural resources to Western transnational corporations, in the cut of the path to transform our country into a colony and a raw material appendage of the West, which was lined by would-be reformers since perestroika and the 90s. Russia is not the countries of Africa and the Middle East dancing to the tune of an overseas master. In recent years, our country has begun to actively and firmly defend its position.

We will not give anyone our rightfully Arctic shelf rich in natural resources. Where else will oil and gas remain, and where will there be enough of it, when it is quite obvious that the resources of the countries of the Persian Gulf and continental fields of Europe and America will run out in the coming decades? About 90% of the entire area of \u200b\u200bthe Russian Arctic shelf falls on promising oil and gas fields. In addition, according to various estimates, the shelf contains up to 80% of Russia's potential hydrocarbon reserves, which means that the extraction of oil and other valuable natural resources on the Arctic shelf is only a matter of time. I am already silent about the reserves of fresh water, forests, potential fertile lands, etc.

Loose nuts are gradually tightening in the country. Mass theft from the Russian budget, which was essentially legalized by the liberals of the 90s, no longer exists. But this is precisely why Europe fidgeted at the moment. Gas now has to be bought without fraud. The government is committed to supporting domestic producers. Yes, not everything is going smoothly in this matter. I myself have a lot of questions for some of the most prominent "managers" in the government. But, nevertheless, it should be admitted that the country's food market is no longer a huge trash can of the 90s, where imported manufacturers and sellers from all over the world dump low-quality goods.

There are no American military bases on Russian territory, and, in addition, the country has actively begun to oppose the expansion of American bases in our neighboring territories.

Everything, the loans that the thoughtless liberals grabbed from the IMF were repaid. Now we are not dependent on the bondage of this "fund" and, accordingly, its "recommendation" to the country is not a decree. Financial policy is more independent than before.

It turns out that Russia has ceased to be a convenient country for competitors: it has continued its nuclear development program; reanimates the fleet; seeks to develop its own production and agriculture, and not rely on one trade in resources; big business is no longer uncontrolled, and the state's share in it has increased significantly.

But in the 90s we were a comfortable country. Everyone shook hands with the "government" of that time, but not their own people. Now the situation is reversed. Do you feel the difference? The country suddenly veered off the path towards slavery and immediately screamed voices from outside in unison with a handful of traitors inside the country. Immediately, the West is trying to carry out a revolution in Russia in order to bring its protégés to power once again. But the Tunisian scenario also did not work for us, and for the Syrian scenario we are too well armed, and the Libyan picture is not at all about us.

Supporters of the fact that we do not need an army, that this is a waste of money and that we need to develop agriculture and production, first of all, argue that after 1945 Japan was deprived of the opportunity to have its own army and nothing - survived and even rose economically .. ...

Have you forgotten that at first Japan was credited by the same States for 100 years ahead, squeezed all the juices out of it, became the sole maritime master of the Asia-Pacific region up to the Philippines, and then gave the opportunity to engage in its own production? From a kind soul allowed to establish production? No, you have to pay back the loans in full. And who is Japan now? That's right, just a puppet in the hands of the United States.

I say that a strong Russian army is essential. And then I get the answer: “But where is our strong army? Scandals with defense orders, etc. are not enough for you? "

I absolutely do not consider all these scandals and high-profile cases of corruption in the defense industry as a continuation of the sawing off and collapse of our country. If they continued to fall apart, we would all sit, as before, and would not have guessed that the defense industry has been rotting for decades like this. But the abscess was opened, which means that the country's leadership has firmly taken up our army and defense industry.

It is the same in science. For decades, accustomed to theft and sawing, Russian "science" suddenly suddenly turns to criticism, and numerous complaints from scientists and people about the situation in the Russian Academy of Sciences and not only become public. After all, if we continued to derail everything, then here too they would continue to be silent, as they have been silent since the 90s.

Recently, President Putin allocated about 23 trillion rubles for the development of the defense industry, of which 20 trillion will go to the development of the armed forces, and the remaining 3 trillion for the development of the defense industry. The amount by today's standards is comparable to the expenses of the times of the USSR. I really hope that this money will be extremely tightly controlled, and its spending will bring a positive result.

Again I hear the phrase: "It would be better if this money was allocated to agriculture ..." I will answer with the words of Napoleon: "The people who do not want to feed their army will soon be forced to feed someone else's." If it is not clear why Napoleon spoke this way, then reread the above by me.

In addition, even after 23 trillion injections into the army and our military budget has grown 10 times since 2000, Russia continues to be the seventh country in the world in terms of arms spending. And the USA continues to be the leader. Strange, but no one reproaches the US government for such wastefulness, even against the background of the fact that the state debt of the States exceeds 100% of GDP. An extremely interesting picture, isn't it? Especially against the backdrop of American attempts to the fact that Russia spends too much on weapons, it looks ridiculous. And it is even more surprising that in our country there are clever, funny people who criticize the Russian government for funding the army ...

Why were we denied the Mistrals? The fact is that we really don't need helicopter carriers themselves, it's true. But together with the helicopter carriers, we had to get the NATO Zenith-9 system and all the licenses and technologies attached to it from the French. The study of this combat information and control system by our scientists and the military would allow our air defense to become even more sophisticated and accurate. Here's a simple answer. And not at all Ukraine with its situation and Poroshenko. Why did the NATO countries prevent the sale of technologies and ships, since the army does not decide anything?

The emphasis in the development of the army and defense industry of Russia as a whole today is placed precisely on air defense and aviation for absolutely understandable reasons - protection from a potential external aggressor.

There will be full protection - there will be an opportunity to invest in agriculture and everything else. Investing in agriculture without an army means one thing - the same wheat will not grow for us. Or do you want to have a developed agriculture, but feeding other people's mouths?

Any country needs a strong army, first of all, in order to defend its peaceful position, in order to preserve the competitive advantages that we have, in order to calmly create, and not lose at one moment everything that we strived for and created.

In conclusion, I would like to recall a few facts about the Battle of Borodino. Only the timely reinforcement of Bagration's army by Kutuzov did not allow the French to realize their plan. And Mikhail Illarionovich himself said: "Even with the loss of Moscow, Russia is not yet lost, with the loss of the army, Russia is lost."